经济学.英文版·第18版/中国教育部推荐原版引进教材 Paul A.Samuelson 2005
价      格:¥ 8.80
VIP优惠 文件类型 清晰程度 文件大小
8折 扫描版PDF 300DPI
点击在线交谈 无需注册会员,可以直接购买!
商品详情
注意:链接有问题的书请登录邮箱查收!!!

即时起网站不再提供充点下载服务,点数没有使用完的顾客需要什么书请直接联系客服!!




此书为PDF电子版,不是纸书,付款后自动发货,弹出百度云盘下载地址和密码,自己下载即可!阅读后如感兴趣,可以去书店购买相应的纸质书籍,下载24小时内请删除!本站展示只是部分图书,如需别的电子书请联系客服!
购买时请填写真实邮箱。邮箱请填写正确并请填写常用邮箱!
电子书购买后不予退款。
切记,付款完成后不要关闭网页,等自动返回。如遇链接失效或密码错误,请于24小时内登录购买时留下的邮箱查收文件。
成功付款,但没有弹出下载地址请联系客服处理。不主动联系客服产生的损失请自负。

即日起网站开通VIP会员,VIP会员直接购买打八折,VIP会员购书流程:
1.注册本站会员
2.登录网站,进入会员中心,点击左边导航“在线充值”,选中“购买VIP会员”,再点充值并付款,完成VIP会员购买。
(链接地址为:http://www.fou001.com/e/member/buygroup/)
3.确认选购的电子书,点立即购买,填写收货人信息,填入优惠码:ODAE4VYFG5UJJDXQWDHH
4.下一步,付款,完成购买

书名:经济学.英文版·第18版/中国教育部推荐原版引进教材
副标题:
作者:Paul A.Samuelson
出版社:机械工业出版社
ISBN:9787111158264
出版时间:2005
页数:776
定价:170.0
内容简介: 美国获诺贝尔经济奖的第一人,现代经济学之父萨缪尔森的《经济学》是一本学习经济学的必读经典。 首版至今逾50年,总销量达数千万册,被译成数十种文字,其思想影响了几代人。 本书具有丰富的课后辅导材料,重视核心分析与现实政策,适合于教学。 本书是2005年的最新版。 为便于读者阅读,本书专门附有中英文对照术语表。 为采用本书作为教材的任课教师提供教辅材料。 经典之作 虽然原文有点难啃,既锻炼英语,又再次系统地学习经济学知识,一举两得,而乐而不为也 经典之作 虽然原文有点难啃,既锻炼英语,又再次系统地学习经济学知识,一举两得,而乐而不为也 Fundamental economic problems, how did the governors and people in the most prosperous ages of China dealt with them? Do they deal with the problems by themselves or are they actually just participants of historical processes? How did the Chinese understand and solve their identified economics issues? 2011-06-23 15:08 Fundamental economic problems, how did the governors and people in the most prosperous ages of China dealt with them? Do they deal with the problems by themselves or are they actually just participants of historical processes? How did the Chinese understand and solve their identified economics issues? Positive economics, no ambiguous morals involved in the problem setting, I.e. Everything factual. Normative economics, in which ethical aspects projected by human onto economic goods are involved. If economics be divided into production and distribution, then production is more related with positive economics, and positive economics focuses on production most naturally. Once distribution is inv... 2011-06-23 14:51 Positive economics, no ambiguous morals involved in the problem setting, I.e. Everything factual. Normative economics, in which ethical aspects projected by human onto economic goods are involved.If economics be divided into production and distribution, then production is more related with positive economics, and positive economics focuses on production most naturally. Once distribution is involved, ethical aspects are inevitable. Discrepancies between individual and aggregate behavior are contended to have been the results of interacting individuals. Why exactly does the system and it's components behave in different ways? Because some the system's properties are not determined by it's components, but by the internal forces, which is equally part of the system? 2011-06-23 14:28 Discrepancies between individual and aggregate behavior are contended to have been the results of interacting individuals. Why exactly does the system and it's components behave in different ways? Because some the system's properties are not determined by it's components, but by the internal forces, which is equally part of the system? Statistics and the scientific method. As oppsing the mathematical inductive reasoning based on certain normative axioms like that of the existence of oneself, which most philosophers adopted until rise of science. 2011-06-23 14:15 Statistics and the scientific method. As oppsing the mathematical inductive reasoning based on certain normative axioms like that of the existence of oneself, which most philosophers adopted until rise of science. In particular, efficiency is defined in margins, I.e. In terms of better and worth offs in everyone's 'economic goods', and suggests a rather 'collective' perspective of bearing the 'goods' of other people in mind, although certainly in marginal terms only and nothing of collectivism is involved. In the book Adam ... 2011-06-22 23:02 Definitions of scarcity and efficiency quoted, as two fundamental assumptions.In particular, efficiency is defined in margins, I.e. In terms of better and worth offs in everyone's 'economic goods', and suggests a rather 'collective' perspective of bearing the 'goods' of other people in mind, although certainly in marginal terms only and nothing of collectivism is involved.In the book Adam Smith is identified as founder of modern microeconomics, and Keynes of macroeconomics. This is surprisingly frank, to admit dependence of mind of a researcher, and how much this stated commitment in a top-selling textbook has contributed to the eminence of Keynesian economics must be at least worth noticing. Statistics and the scientific method. As oppsing the mathematical inductive reasoning based on certain normative axioms like that of the existence of oneself, which most philosophers adopted until rise of science. 2011-06-23 14:15 Statistics and the scientific method. As oppsing the mathematical inductive reasoning based on certain normative axioms like that of the existence of oneself, which most philosophers adopted until rise of science. Discrepancies between individual and aggregate behavior are contended to have been the results of interacting individuals. Why exactly does the system and it's components behave in different ways? Because some the system's properties are not determined by it's components, but by the internal forces, which is equally part of the system? 2011-06-23 14:28 Discrepancies between individual and aggregate behavior are contended to have been the results of interacting individuals. Why exactly does the system and it's components behave in different ways? Because some the system's properties are not determined by it's components, but by the internal forces, which is equally part of the system? Fundamental economic problems, how did the governors and people in the most prosperous ages of China dealt with them? Do they deal with the problems by themselves or are they actually just participants of historical processes? How did the Chinese understand and solve their identified economics issues? 2011-06-23 15:08 Fundamental economic problems, how did the governors and people in the most prosperous ages of China dealt with them? Do they deal with the problems by themselves or are they actually just participants of historical processes? How did the Chinese understand and solve their identified economics issues? Fundamental economic problems, how did the governors and people in the most prosperous ages of China dealt with them? Do they deal with the problems by themselves or are they actually just participants of historical processes? How did the Chinese understand and solve their identified economics issues? 2011-06-23 15:08 Fundamental economic problems, how did the governors and people in the most prosperous ages of China dealt with them? Do they deal with the problems by themselves or are they actually just participants of historical processes? How did the Chinese understand and solve their identified economics issues? Positive economics, no ambiguous morals involved in the problem setting, I.e. Everything factual. Normative economics, in which ethical aspects projected by human onto economic goods are involved. If economics be divided into production and distribution, then production is more related with positive economics, and positive economics focuses on production most naturally. Once distribution is inv... 2011-06-23 14:51 Positive economics, no ambiguous morals involved in the problem setting, I.e. Everything factual. Normative economics, in which ethical aspects projected by human onto economic goods are involved.If economics be divided into production and distribution, then production is more related with positive economics, and positive economics focuses on production most naturally. Once distribution is involved, ethical aspects are inevitable. Discrepancies between individual and aggregate behavior are contended to have been the results of interacting individuals. Why exactly does the system and it's components behave in different ways? Because some the system's properties are not determined by it's components, but by the internal forces, which is equally part of the system? 2011-06-23 14:28 Discrepancies between individual and aggregate behavior are contended to have been the results of interacting individuals. Why exactly does the system and it's components behave in different ways? Because some the system's properties are not determined by it's components, but by the internal forces, which is equally part of the system? Statistics and the scientific method. As oppsing the mathematical inductive reasoning based on certain normative axioms like that of the existence of oneself, which most philosophers adopted until rise of science. 2011-06-23 14:15 Statistics and the scientific method. As oppsing the mathematical inductive reasoning based on certain normative axioms like that of the existence of oneself, which most philosophers adopted until rise of science.
免责申明:
本站仅提供学习的平台,所有资料均来自于网络,版权归原创者所有!本站不提供任何保证,并不承担任何法律责任,如果对您的版权或者利益造成损害,请联系我们,我们将尽快予以处理。